Elin Fox
Maker
“My sample is the non-attracted comparison type.”
EASY · CASE FILE
Easy · TINKER WORKSHOP
An unlabelled sample was recovered from a workbench. A controlled test found it was not attracted to the workshop magnet. The same test was performed on each maker’s sample type. Identify the matching maker.
Read the case file below, or open the interactive desk to examine records, keep notes and submit your reasoning. These are the case materials, without the solution.
Inspect, test and record the finding. What does the verified record establish?
Maker
“My sample is the non-attracted comparison type.”
Maker
“My sample is the first attracted type.”
Maker
“My sample is the second attracted type.”
Read each record on its own terms. A claim made by a person is different from a fact established by an independent record.
DESK RECORD
The workshop bought metal samples last month without recording which maker used each bench.
The workshop bought metal samples last month without recording which maker used each bench.
CONTROLLED MAGNET TEST
The recovered sample was NOT attracted. The verified comparison tests were: Elin’s type — NOT attracted; Finn’s type — attracted; Greta’s type — attracted. All samples were bare and unmodified.
This is a verified source record for this case. Compare its stated facts with the exact question.
LOCATION SKETCH
Several samples were mixed on the same bench. Their positions were not recorded.
Several samples were mixed on the same bench. Their positions were not recorded.
Use the interactive case desk to select your finding and cite the records that support it. The answer is checked there, and your progress stays in your browser.
Compare the records with each account. Work out what the evidence establishes, then separate that finding from anything it does not prove.