Skip to content
The Detective’s Desk

HARD · CASE FILE

Two Carriers, Different Knowledge

Hard · An archive’s outgoing-copy shelf

A stitched original is recovered from an outgoing parcel. Two carriers handled it, but only one received a private-sale instruction. Determine who diverted it, who knew and who followed a misleading ordinary errand.

Investigate this case

Read the case file below, or open the interactive desk to examine records, keep notes and submit your reasoning. These are the case materials, without the solution.

The scene

The original is recovered before it leaves the secured gate. The archive’s private handover messages and shelf camera are preserved. There is no unrecorded parcel exchange.

People and accounts

Oren Shaw

Archive supervisor

What happened from your point of view?

I sent the sealed transcript for authorised copying. I did not arrange for it to leave the archive.

What detail should I check independently?

The original transcript’s purple stitch distinguishes it from the office duplicate.

Leo Reed

Duty officer

What happened from your point of view?

I detained the courier at the archive gate.

What detail should I check independently?

The parcel was still sealed when I made the detention record.

Ciro Bell

Private courier

What happened from your point of view?

I collected the parcel under a buyer code. I knew it contained the stitched original, not a duplicate.

What detail should I check independently?

My fee depended on the original reaching the buyer.

Mina Ward

Copy clerk

What happened from your point of view?

I carried the closed parcel to the collection shelf. Oren said it was an authorised duplicate.

What detail should I check independently?

I refused to sign that I had checked its contents.

Nell Voss

Archive reader

What happened from your point of view?

I worked at the public reading camera during the collection.

What detail should I check independently?

Oren refused my request for a copy, which is why I complained.

Case records

Read each record on its own terms. A claim made by a person is different from a fact established by an independent record.

Physical record · Archive desk

Clerk’s full instruction

Oren describes a duplicate for authorised copying. Mina replies that she can carry the sealed parcel but cannot certify its contents. No sale or removal of an original is disclosed to her.

Physical record · Archive desk

Copy permission register

No private sale or removal of the original was approved. Nell’s public copying request was refused, but the reading camera keeps her away from the packed parcel.

Physical record · Archive desk

Archive packing view

Oren wraps the purple-stitched original and marks it “authorised duplicate”. Mina arrives after he seals it and carries it to the shelf without opening it.

Physical record · Secured gate

Gate opening record

The parcel contains the purple-stitched original transcript, not the stitch-free office duplicate. Leo opens it under supervision after detaining Ciro.

Physical record · Collection shelf

Private courier agreement

Oren tells Ciro that the buyer requires the purple-stitched original. Ciro’s reply accepts a fee contingent on delivering that original to the private address.

Physical record · Collection shelf

Predated payment instruction

The buyer’s escrow instruction names Oren and Ciro and the stitched original. It is dated before Mina’s routine delivery task and contains no payment or instruction to her.

Physical record · Collection shelf

Shelf and gate continuity

The same marked parcel passes from Mina’s shelf delivery to Ciro’s collection, then to Leo’s detention. Its seal remains intact.

Questions to resolve

Who organised the unauthorised diversion?

Who knowingly accepted delivery of the original to the buyer?

Who carried a sealed parcel without established knowledge of the sale?

Which object is recovered at the gate?

Use the interactive case desk to select your finding and cite the records that support it. The answer is checked there, and your progress stays in your browser.

Build your finding

Compare the records with each account. Work out what the evidence establishes, then separate that finding from anything it does not prove.

Open the interactive case More Hard case files