Skip to content
The Detective’s Desk

HARD · CASE FILE

Four Drafts and One Final Instruction

Hard · A private family foundation

Four draft instructions use the same signature page. Establish which was actually approved, which was submitted and whether a witness knew the difference.

Investigate this case

Read the case file below, or open the interactive desk to examine records, keep notes and submit your reasoning. These are the case materials, without the solution.

The scene

This fictional foundation uses its supplied internal approval rule: each approved page must share a matching embossed code and the signed register. No legal knowledge is required.

People and accounts

Rina Bell

Grant officer

What happened from your point of view?

The board approved beneficiary A on draft 4.

What should I check to test that account?

The embossed code and register identify the approved pair.

Evan Moss

Courier

What happened from your point of view?

I delivered the closed submission packet.

What should I check to test that account?

I never selected its pages.

Leah Reed

Accounts reviewer

What happened from your point of view?

The submitted first page pays Selma’s private studio.

What should I check to test that account?

I stopped it before transfer and kept all drafts.

Selma Hart

Foundation secretary

What happened from your point of view?

The submitted instruction is the approved one.

What should I check to test that account?

The signature page is genuine.

Omar Cole

Page witness

What happened from your point of view?

I witnessed only the signature.

What should I check to test that account?

Selma told me afterward which first page she planned to attach.

Case records

Read each record on its own terms. A claim made by a person is different from a fact established by an independent record.

Case record · Reception

Courier’s closed-packet record

Evan receives the already sealed packet and delivers it intact. His instruction is delivery only.

Case record · Accounts desk

Reviewer’s payment hold

Leah detects the code mismatch and halts transfer. No grant money reaches the studio.

Case record · Secretary desk

Witness’s prior reply

Selma tells Omar she will attach the studio page despite the board’s refusal. Omar replies, “I know; I will describe the whole pair as the approved D4.” This predates submission.

Case record · Board desk

Internal approval rule

An approved pair requires the same embossed page code and a matching two-page register entry. A genuine signature alone is insufficient.

Case record · Secretary desk

All retained drafts

D1 and D3 are abandoned alternatives. D2 pays Selma’s studio; D4 pays beneficiary A. The supplied full set excludes a harmless same-text reprint.

Case record · Accounts desk

Stopped submitted packet

The first page pays Selma’s studio and bears draft code D2; the genuine signed second page bears D4.

Case record · Board desk

Signed approval register

The board approves draft 4, code D4, paying community beneficiary A. Both approved page impressions are recorded.

Case record · Secretary desk

Secretary’s packing note

Selma signs that she replaces D4’s first page with D2 before sealing the submitted packet.

Questions to resolve

Who substitutes the studio-payment first page?

Who knowingly agrees to vouch for the substituted pair?

Which instruction was actually approved?

What is the payment outcome?

Use the interactive case desk to select your finding and cite the records that support it. The answer is checked there, and your progress stays in your browser.

Build your finding

Compare the records with each account. Work out what the evidence establishes, then separate that finding from anything it does not prove.

Open the interactive case More Hard case files